Skip to content

This content is more than five years old

Report

Inquiry into the quality of general practice: the management of acute illness

Authors

  • "Default Staff Avatar"

    Roger Jones

  • "Default Staff Avatar"

    Patrick White

  • "Default Staff Avatar"

    David Armstrong

  • "Default Staff Avatar"

    Mark Ashworth

  • "Default Staff Avatar"

    Marilyn Peters

  • "Default Staff Avatar"

    Roger Jones

  • "Default Staff Avatar"

    Patrick White

The assessment, differentiation and treatment of minor and potentially serious acute conditions are core skills of general practice.

Up to two-thirds of primary care contacts are with patients who have acute problems. These consultations draw on wide-ranging expertise from diagnosis and judicious prescribing, to communication and case management.

What did we explore?

To inform its work, the Inquiry panel commissioned a research project to examine what good-quality acute care in general practice looks like, and how it can be measured. Managing acute illness provides a framework for assessing the quality of the different types of acute care in general practice. The paper is written by a team from the Department of General Practice and Primary Care, King's College London: Professor Roger Jones, Professor David Armstrong, Patrick White, Mark Ashworth and Marilyn Peters.

What have we learnt about general practice and acute illness?

In March 2010 the Inquiry held a seminar on the management of acute illness with participants including GPs, practice nurses, NHS executives, health academics and patient representatives.

Key issues raised in discussion include:

  • Does a regular clinical audit or significant events analysis by a general practice improve the quality of acute care?

  • Should the location in which the acute care takes place be a marker of quality, given the national agenda of care closer to home?

  • Are there ways to use routinely collected primary care data to measure the quality of acute illness management?

Comments