Second’s out, round two: Is the government’s latest childhood obesity plan a knockout?
Less than a year since its underwhelming first attempt, the government has just released round two of its plan for childhood obesity. What has the government learned since the last time round and is it still pulling its punches?
Around a third of children aged 2 to 15 in the UK are overweight or obese. Children are becoming obese at an earlier age, staying obese for longer and children from lower income household are more than twice as likely to be obese than those in high income households. This is a population health and an inequalities problem.
The government’s first childhood obesity plan was simply not good enough to address these challenges; it was widely derided and not only by the usual public health suspects. The plan didn’t measure up in many areas including price promotions, marketing and advertising, labelling, information, or giving local authorities stronger regulatory powers.
But it wasn’t all bad, the soft drinks levy on sugar in soft drinks was widely welcomed. Since then we’ve seen that the industry response has been so dramatic that HM Treasury’s forecasts of how much the levy would raise have turned out to be over-optimistic, as drinks have been reformulated to avoid it. The plan also included work on reformulation of foodstuffs, such as cakes and biscuits, through a voluntary agreement monitored by Public Health England. Public Health England recently announced the results of progress in the first year of this agreement: the 5 per cent target was missed, with an average reduction across categories of 2 per cent.
The obesity plan, chapter 2 is now here. Is it any better than the first? One way to answer that is to assess it against the Health and Social Care Committee’s refreshed recommendations based on its most recent grilling of the experts. The table below shows how the updated plan measures up against the Committee’s key asks.
How does the obesity plan chapter 2 measure up?
Health and Social Care Committee recommendation
The Obesity Plan 'round two'
A whole systems approach
Cabinet Committee for obesity with mandatory reporting across departments
No cabinet sub-committee or mandatory reporting of actions across departments
Targets, with a focus on health inequality reduction
Ambitions to halve the rate of childhood obesity by 2030, no specific numerical commitment on reducing inequalities
Greater powers for local government including health as a licensing objective
No new powers, but will work on ‘trailblazer programme’ to maximise use of existing powers with focus on inequalities; provision of training for planning inspectors
Extend soft drinks levy to milk-based drink
Extension to be considered in 2020 HM Treasury review; will consult on ending sale of energy drinks to children
Advertising, marketing and price promotions
9pm watershed controls on advertising of high in fat, sugar or salt (HFSS) products
Will consult on 9pm watershed controls for HFSS products by end 2018
Ban on cartoon characters advertising HFSS products
No new announcement, ‘no new plans’, NIHR obesity unit will continue to monitor
Alignment of regulation between broadcast and social media
Intention to legislate, with consultation by end 2018
Calorie labelling for out-of-home food sector
Intention to legislate, will consult by end of 2018; will consider additional simplification of labelling following EU exit
End buy one, get one free (BOGOF) and similar promotions
Intention to ban BOGOF (plus free refills, etc) of HFSS products, consult by end 2018
Remove unhealthy products from end of aisles
Intention to legislate to end ‘promotion of unhealthy food and drink by location’ eg, end of aisle. Consult by end 2018
Early years, schools and their environment
Targets for breastfeeding
No new announcement
‘Full implementation’ of 2016 childhood obesity plan commitments on schools
Action across a range of areas, but not all. Additional activity on ‘daily mile’, updating School Food Standards
New powers for local government to limit HFSS billboards near schools
No new announcement
Make it easier for local government to limit ‘unhealthy food outlets’ close to schools
Nothing specific, though trailblazer programme (see above) is likely to include this
Access to effective services for children and families
No new announcement
There are six green, five red and four amber ratings. This is progress, and the government has bitten the bullet on one of the areas it was most criticised for last time round – marketing and advertising – with controls on both signalled across a broad range of areas. Chapter 2 signals the intention to legislate in many of these areas with consultation due to start by the end of 2018.
The government has not moved on some specifics such as banning cartoon characters associated with high in fat, salt or sugar (HFSS) products or improving weight management or breastfeeding services – the latter might come through other means, following the announcement of the recent NHS settlement, we shall have to wait and see. But there is progress– if not yet a green light – on a wide range of the areas that the Health and Social Care Committee highlighted, and strong signals that the government will move again, including on reformulation of foods, if the industry does not speed up progress.
We welcome the ambition to halve childhood obesity by 2030 and the commitment to narrow inequalities – although it is slightly disappointing there is no specific ambition on the latter beyond ‘significantly’. We also welcome closer working and support for local government around the fitness for purpose of existing planning powers but notice the government has not gone as far as the Committee wanted on new powers.
Overall, the government has clearly focused on advertising, marketing and price promotions, areas where the original childhood obesity plan was most criticised. But a final red mark: the government has ignored the Health and Social Care Select Committee’s view that a new cross-government committee is required to co-ordinate and hold to account government departments for their contributions to tackling childhood obesity. There therefore remains work for us all to do in holding the government to account for these intentions and commitments.