The bad news is that the latest data for 2018/19 shows the crocodile’s mouth has opened even wider. Compared to 2015/16 (the last year for which we have equivalent data), requests have grown by six per cent but the number of people receiving formal care packages has fallen 2 per cent.
However, the ‘crocodile’ name is also appropriate because, like the animal’s reputation for fake tears, the graph is somewhat deceptive. Combining the numbers for both working-age adults and older people, obscures two rather different trends.
For working-age adults, the trend is one of a large increase in demand (ten per cent since 2015/16), with the number receiving long-term care up three per cent (six per cent if short term care is included). For older people requests for support are up four per cent since 2015/16 but the number receiving long-term care is down seven per cent (five percent including short term care). These trends tell different stories (and only the graph for older people looks like our old friend, the crocodile’s mouth).
We said in Social care 360 that the differing trends might be explained, at least in part, by differing rates of reported disability among older people and working-age adults (and we also touched on possible reasons for the wider trends on access). We’ll examine this further in our 2020 report, when we will have the most recent data on disability prevalence.
This deceptive difference between working-age adults and older people is also in evidence when we look at the newest figures on costs to local authorities of purchasing residential and nursing care. Here, the trend for both is going in the same, upward direction – both have increased faster than inflation, as commissioners respond to providers leaving the market or handing back contracts (in turn driven in part by the extra costs of staff).
Yet the increase for over-65s at more than 10 per cent since 2015/16 is far higher than for 18–64 year olds. One reason for this difference may be that costs of placements for working-age adults are so much higher to begin with – virtually double that of placements for older people. Local authorities may feel there is more scope for cost-minimisation with these packages than with those for older people.
Still, with costs of both increasing faster than inflation it puts one final trend into perspective. Total expenditure by councils has risen since 2014/15, as government has recognised the crisis in the sector and responded with short-term cash for local authorities. Yet, as with the crocodile graph, this is somewhat deceptive. First, much of that expenditure will, inevitably, have been on the increasing costs of purchasing care rather than providing it to more people. And second, despite these increases in expenditure, real-terms spending is still £300 million below where it was in 2010/11.
Very little, then, to smile about.
I may need residential care in years to come. So might you! The under-funding and selling off to property developers of prime building sites is going unnoticed and is a scandal! In Surrey alone 8 care homes will close by the end of 2024. In February 2022 Leader of Surrey County Council Tim Oliver said "Post covid people's attitudes to care homes has changed - there hasn't been the same demand to take up those places as there was pre-covid". His empty words wash over a terrible situation for vulnerable people. Just one more Conservative-controlled council unable to consider the well-being of the most vulnerable people in our 21st century uncaring society who are at the end of the Conservative government's pecking order. Shameful.
So much for promises .so much for end of austerity. All tory lies