The prevention vision presented today is the first attempt by the Secretary of State to outline what that actually means. But those wanting lots of detailed commitments will be disappointed: this is not a fully formed strategy but a starting point, setting out the stall of what may develop in future. There is a welcome commitment to add more detail in a Green Paper in the first half of next year.
In outline then, the vision sets out the case for prevention – and the roles for individuals, the NHS and local authorities, urging them to ‘put prevention at the heart of everything they do’. It’s good on recognising the causes of ill health, including the role of work, homes, air pollution, social connections and the importance of community, and on the role of wider workforces in prevention, including fire, housing and leisure services. Readers will not be surprised to see a role for technology, including ‘predictive prevention’ to ‘prevent people becoming patients’, mental health, primary care, secondary prevention, including remote monitoring and video consultation. It also flags the important role of the criminal justice system. There are long lists of activities and existing commitments. In short, there is something for everyone in this vision; it’s hard not to like. The question is making it happen – coherently, at scale and with the right level of resources in the right place.
How far this moves from aspirational vision to action will be signalled by three key decisions. First is the local government settlement expected in December, when we are likely to hear about the trajectory for local government allocations from central government, including for the public health grant. Will the government do anything about the cuts we’ve already seen, and about the others planned? Second, and at around the same time or slightly before, we are also likely to get the NHS long-term plan, in which prevention is one of many themes (and bundled with health inequalities and ‘personal responsibility’). Will the long-term plan do better than the NHS five year forward view in prioritising prevention, alongside population health and health inequalities, as we have argued? The vision does signal the need to invest more in primary and community health services, let’s see if that’s borne out in the plan itself. Third is the Spending Review itself next year, and for which the Green Paper will be a vehicle for the Department of Health and Social Care to show just what it means to prioritise prevention against ‘cure’.
Intellectual effort should now focus on the Green Paper. Today’s strategy needs further work, turning the welcome recognition of what drives people’s health into changes in policy and cross-government action, and how exactly it will meet the government’s grand challenge of five years extra healthy life by 2035. There is nothing in here on that, and there is far too little detail on health inequalities, where we do know that concerted and consistent cross-government action can turn the tide on widening inequalities in health – as part of which the NHS needs to step up. We look forward to feeding in the work we have been doing over the past year on a vision for population health that will be launched at our annual conference at the end of this month.
In the words of Professor David Oliver (clinical vice president of the Royal College of Physicians and Visiting Fellow at The King’s Fund): ‘From now on, every time I hear people using policy rhetoric to make the case for prevention, I’ll ask them, “So, what policies and funding do we have in place to back the paper talk and make it happen?”.’ We truly welcome the Secretary of State’s focus on prioritising prevention. But we also wait for the answer to David’s question – before Christmas in the Green Paper, and in the Spending Review next year.
WHO has always claimed that prevention is better than cure, as did my mother who was a medalist nurse as did my great aunt who nursed in the Crimean war. There must be some truth in the idea so suggest that Matt Hancock provides more NHS staff funding rather than stating the obvious or telling us to eat an apple a day.
The Coalition government and the Conservative party since 2010 have taken a wrecking ball in the form of the policy commonly called austerity to cut public services which has had a real detrimental impact on health , it's the height of hypocrisy for Matt Hancock or any member of the current government to now pop up and suggest people need to take responsibility for their own health , it also follows the traditional Tory tactic of blaming people for their ill health. Preventative healthcare and health education are very important and if Matt Hancock truly cared about the issue and the people he would restore the funding cuts that have taken place in the past 8 years and invest in education and health advice.
But of course that will never happen , Matt Hancock and the Conservative's Prevention Vision is all focused on preventing the expenditure of resources on the public health and public services so they can as they have once again in this years budget offer up tax cuts to the rich and powerful.
I agree wholeheartedly with the statement above. If you work on the front line like I do what you cannot escape from is the link between deprivation/ poverty and lack of opportunity that so obviously affects people’s mental health and physical health care needs. A government who refuses to see the hardship they have caused by the introduction of Universal Credit and the stress this creates for the individuals who are dependent on this to make ends meet the basics whilst in work is shocking to see. Women are also disproportionately affected by having to try and make up the shortfall whilst caring for children. Children taken into care just because the stress of the situation adds layers of stress on the parent trying to do it all. Where is the sense in paying out thousands for care of those children by starving them whilst they live with their mother so that they have to go into care. Individual landlords are having a bonanza of profit and nest building their futures whilst working families can’t pay the exhorbitant rents. My nursing colleagues are in this position. It is shaming us all that a nurse may be subject to this imbalance of resources and be expected to work the long hours they do and yet still may have to have Universal Credit to make ends meet. Anyone who thinks this is acceptable and the individuals fault is living in total denial of the facts. Just have a look around,it’s not hard to see where the Tory rhetoric leads.
As a registered nurse who is also a Professor of Public Health (one of only two in the UK) I want to hear about how investing in nurses, research, practice development and education on this area can make huge contributions to reducing inequalities in health and promoting health....not just another discussion of throwing more money at the GP`s....if we always do what we have always done we always get what we have always got. x