Read all about it: media coverage of NHS rationing

‘NHS spending… back to the 50s’

‘Hip operations banned if you can sleep: NHS bids to save millions with a new pain threshold test as it rules out surgeries on those deemed too fat’

‘Referral centres cause 'dangerous' NHS delays’

This is just a tiny sample of the NHS-related headlines in newspapers this winter. The health service is a source of public interest and media scrutiny regardless of the economic and political context, but the spotlight has intensified over recent weeks as pressures have deepened. As part of the work for our forthcoming report on NHS financial pressures, we examined how the media have reported on NHS pressures in recent years by looking at coverage of the controversial and sometimes highly emotive term ‘rationing’.

We undertook a retrospective search for articles mentioning the term rationing in relation to the NHS in eight media sources (BBC News, Daily Mail, The Guardian, The Metro, The Mirror, The Sun, The Times and The Telegraph) between January 2011 and December 2016.

NHS rationing was reported regularly throughout the five-year period, but increased markedly towards the end. A total of 86 stories in 2011 grew to 144 in 2015 and 225 in 2016. There was also a shift in the nature of reporting: in the latter half of 2016, we started to see increasingly hard-hitting stories about rationing due to the severe financial difficulties facing the NHS, with warnings that it is ‘in meltdown’ and ‘on the brink of collapse’.

The results of our search also provide an insight into the sorts of things that are reported as rationing, revealing that the term is usually understood to relate to access. Common subjects include: variations in access between different areas (often described as the ‘postcode lottery’); restrictions in access to drugs, equipment, surgery and other procedures; and rising waiting times for treatment.

We have previously suggested that dilution of quality is an important form of NHS rationing; however it can be extremely difficult to identify. Only a small handful of the articles in our search reported quality issues; this may relate to the search terms used rather than overall reporting on quality, but also suggests that the media tend to associate the sensitive issue of rationing with access rather than quality.

Since we completed our search, there has been a tidal wave of media coverage detailing winter pressures in hospitals and rationing of care. Re-running our search for January 2017, we found more than 30 results in that month alone. The human stories behind these issues have been starkly illustrated in the recent BBC television series ‘Hospital’, which follows staff and patients at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, highlighting the impact of pressures both for patients receiving or waiting to receive care, and for frontline staff managing competing demands as they try to deliver care in an overstretched system.

So how might this impact on policy-making? Jo Maybin’s research exploring how civil servants in the Department of Health learn about health policy issues found that experiences of frontline care – for example through professional visits or personal experience – can have a profound effect on their understanding. Although media coverage may not have the strength or degree of influence that first-hand experience does, the focus on individual patient stories and personal experiences of rationing can help bring the issues to life. Previous research has also observed that media reporting can be influential in shaping the decisions and priorities of policy-makers.

But while media coverage may help to raise the profile of issues among policy-makers and the public, there is a risk that it narrows the focus. In keeping with the tendency to focus on the visible, recent coverage has continued to centre around access issues and hospital care. For example, there has been widespread coverage of A&E waits and decisions by various clinical commissioning groups to limit surgery for smokers and obese patients. This contrasts with limited coverage of changes to public health and community-based services – for example in genito-urinary medicine (GUM) services – despite significant cuts in many areas.

As we highlight in our forthcoming report, some of the most pressing problems in the system are much harder to see, as they relate to risks to the quality of care and problems in community-based services. Care delivered outside hospitals is less visible, and national oversight (including targets, quality metrics and data collection) is limited. As pressures continue, it will be important to ensure a broader focus on issues across the system, even if people aren’t shouting about these as loudly.

  • Our forthcoming report explores the impact of financial pressures on patient care, specifically in four service areas: GUM services, district nursing, elective hip replacements and neonatal care. The report is due to be published on 14 March.
  • Six ways NHS financial pressures can affect patient care

Keep up to date

Subscribe to our email newsletters and follow @TheKingsFund on Twitter to see our latest news and content.

Comments

#549051 Scarlett McNally
Consultant Orthopaedic surgeon
East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

Well done on suggesting a broader focus on health. 70% of the UK NHS budget is for conditions that might have been preventable or improvable and we all need to act... More at: http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2017/02/08/what-if-the-nhs-acknowledged-that-ag...

#549053 Edel McCaffrey
Head of Communications
Healthcare at Home

Very interesting article Anna. One observation I have is the lack of media interest in some of the solutions to the current challenges. For example, clinical care at home, if adopted at scale, has the potential to release 500,000 beds for the NHS in England alone enabling trusts to carry out more elective surgery, manage emergency admissions and save money, but has been underreported up until now. Check out this report: https://www.hah.co.uk/no-place-like-home/
Where do you think media attention will be over the weeks ahead?

#549054 Prof. Minesh Khashu
Consultant Neonatologist
Poole Hospital NHS FT

Anna,

As you are well aware the health service is a very passionate topic for discussion. However a lot of the coverage is very headline oriented and much less substance. In this context publications from KF and similar organisations serve a very important purpose. Having said that, I am not sure how much attention the 'decision makers and powers that be' give to it.
The only way to salvage the system is through more funding and by collective work of society as a whole i. e. MAKING HEALTH A SOCIAL MOVEMENT.

One of the ways of starting on this journey is :

http://linkis.com/www.express.co.uk/ne/VeRjR

#549067 Beth Cameron
PR & Communications Officer
Faculty of Sport and Exercise Medicine UK

Thanks for this very useful media research, I too would like to see more media interest in solutions and working examples of services which improve health and health economies across primary and secondary care. It was refreshing to see some recent coverage on the development of apps that help self management. Exercise medicine often falls under the radar, but it is perhaps one of the more obvious, but not headline grabbing solutions. For examples of working models of care http://www.fsem.ac.uk/media-resources/publications/a-fresh-approach-in-p...

#549069 arif azad
public health policy researcher

Thank you Anna for the preview of the forthcoming research . One interesting piece of information relates to less media coverage of public health related cuts . While STPs advocate a shift from the hospital to community care as part of money saving exercise , logically public health as preventive remedy should take precedence . Yet public health funds and services are being cut at the same time . This is despite a clear recognition of the fact that more of public health will be required to save up on increasing costs of hospital care .

Add new comment