Leadership and engagement for improvement in the NHS
Leadership and engagement for improvement in the NHS: together we can makes the case for engaging staff, patients and boards and for building relationships across systems of care. Building on the work of The King's Fund's 2011 Leadership Commission, the 2012 review has taken evidence from a number of national and international experts. Their evidence makes a compelling case for leadership and engagement:
- organisations whose staff are engaged deliver a better patient experience, fewer errors and higher staff morale
- engaging patients in their care can ensure that care is more appropriate and improve outcomes
- increasing recognition of the importance of integrated care requires leaders to be effective across systems, both within and outside the NHS.
To make engagement a reality requires action at all levels, from the NHS Commissioning Board to the teams delivering care for patients. It also requires commitment to training and development of clinical staff in leadership skills from early in their careers. The unifying vision for every leader should be engaging for improvement with a clear focus on improving patient care and population health outcomes.
More on the 2012 Leadership Review
- Read the supporting papers for this review above
- Read Chris Ham's blog: Why engagement matters
- Watch video interviews with prominent leaders in this area
- Find out more about the review of leadership in the NHS and the related Second annual NHS leadership and management summit
Keep up to date
Subscribe to our email newsletters and follow @TheKingsFund on Twitter to see our latest news and content.
Comments
Leadership development is absolutely crucial if the government reforms are to stand any chance of working. General Practice consists of small businesses which are commissioning from complex larger health organisations. Leadership needs to be developed locally and also to ensure that specialist services are commissioned appropriately longer term.
If sense were common, we would all have it. Leadership development must include the concept that if you want to get the best out of your staff, or if you want to provide the best possible service, you must really want to listen to your employees, listen to your 'customers' and put place mechanisms that allow this to happen. Then - most importantly - you must be prepared to respond. All too often 'engagement' is little more than a tick-box office. Remember, communication does not mean engagement.
I completely agree with your comment with regards to general practice/s requiring good leadership. However,so this is not just rhetoric how would you suggest this is accomplished? when indeed they are made up of several small businesses, gaining consensus and all moving in the same direction will be challenging.
The book "Radical Management" has some excellent practical advice on leadership, engagement and collaboration.
Leadership development is very crucial to improve the smooth running of the institution. It can be acchived by listening staffs involve them in decision making also listen patient'sc experiences.
Engaged, well led staff will create a climate in which staff feel empowered. The power of them learning by doing and receiving immediate and relevant feedback and the ability to effect change will lead to improved patient outcomes and increased staff moral.
I have worked in organisations that are well led with wonderful staff engagement. When working in an environment like this people and patients prosper in many ways.
In contrast, I have worked in organisations where engagement is poor, new ideas are surpressed and fear is created if you 'rock the boat'. What happens in these organisations? Morale is low and staff leave.
I believe a good leader always engages staff in discussion and involves in decision making. I am proud to say the place I work have a good leader and listens to staffs thoughts and is approachable.
Add new comment