At the 10th annual European session of the Global Health Leadership Forum’s executive programme, recently held here at The King’s Fund, I was reminded of a saying attributed to a West African health professional: ‘Learning about culture is like learning a language. The same words often mean different things. What does family mean? Responsibility? Respect? What does pain mean? What is a good life? These ideas probably exist in all cultures but they are not always thought of or expressed in the same way.’
As we met on Day one to discuss integrated care it was quickly apparent that this term meant different things for health care in South Africa, Singapore, Saudi Arabia, Peru and the UK to name just five of the eighteen countries represented this year. We helped participants to represent their diverse perspectives visually, creating a panel focused on the term ‘no wrong door for the patient.’ The visual representation was seen by many as a key highlight of the programme, and participants acknowledged the role they have as leaders in working within their local resources and diverse contexts.
As the programme progressed, the participants, stimulated by a range of presentations, discussed and challenged the differences and similarities in their understanding of other themes such as mental health and dementia, innovation in health, contracting and payment methods and wellness. Through field trips and sharing information on individual projects, this community of leaders made a paradigm shift from some traditional views that ‘West is best’ to understanding that they can co-create solutions, taking the best from developed economies as well as learning from the innovation found in emerging economies.
As one participant, Murray Ross, explored the impact that President Obama’s attempt to get his health reforms through was having on the imminent US elections, participants were reminded of the impact politics has on the provision of health. One of the group’s collective wishes was for politicians to show leadership in letting positive health care reforms (irrespective of genesis) the time they need to deliver improvements and to stop unleashing new programmes with each successive political changeover.
The event was a timely reminder of the contrast between the ‘entitlement culture’ that can operate in developed economies – including our own NHS – and the ‘working within the limits of our means’ that countries such as Brazil, Kenya and India bring to meeting global health challenges.
One thing that united all participants was a belief that great leadership was needed to meet the global health challenges of the next 10 years. In concluding comments, participants said that the Forum had helped them think of ‘ideas to improve health care’. We hope that this dialogue will continue to progress in line with The King’s Fund’s mission ‘ideas that change health care.’ We have a lot to learn from each other.
Views from the Global Health Leadership Forum
- Click on the triangle in the middle of the screen, directly below the image.
- You can zoom into areas that most interest you by clicking on the + icon.
- If you want to view the prezi in full screen, click on the More button in the bottom right-hand corner and click 'Fullscreen'. Press 'Esc' on your keyboard to return to the site.
Comments
A very powerful program!
I have been lucky enough in the past to be involved in a number of international collaborations. I believe we often ingnore the lessons from around the world and in particular the developing countries.
Adversity breeds innovation. When money cannot be thrown at a problem other solutions are found. These can be remarkable.
I remember how impressive the approach of Cuba was to Primary Care when I visited 10 years ago. It was first time I had seen the polyclinic approach.
But I am also reminded of the powerful link between politics and healthcare systems. In many ways a helathcare system is a window into the psyche of a nation. Its my belief that this is the reason that healthcare is such a powerful political tool.
I believe that innovation in other health systems needs to be looked at in terms of the drivers that supported its creation. These are often both politcial and social. This in turn means that lifting innovation from one system to another is not the simple matter of replication - co-production is the way forward both in terms of introduction into the NHS and sharing success from the NHS with international partners.
Add your comment